Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 23902

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : ER10 - ER14 Full Version

Varied Histomorphological Presentations of Appendiceal Neoplasms: A Case Series of Eight Cases


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64301.18296
Dhivya Balaiya, Anithachellam Annadurai, Jayakarthiga Subbiah Rajendran

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dhivya Balaiya,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur-613004, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dhivyasmc05@gmail.com

Abstract

During routine histopathological study of appendicular specimens, we identified eight cases of appendiceal tumours, including five cases of Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms (LAMN) and three cases of adenocarcinoma. Among the adenocarcinoma cases, one was a rare colorectal type adenocarcinoma in an older male and two were mucinous adenocarcinoma which includes a case of signet ring cell rich type. These tumours were classified and staged according to the recent WHO classification (5th edition) and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) staging manual. The median age in our series was 60 years. Serum markers were evaluated in two cases of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP), which showed elevated levels of CA-125 and CA 19.9 in each case. In this case series, three patients were initially diagnosed with acute appendicitis, one case as mucocele, two cases underwent surgery for ovarian malignancy, one patient was operated for an incisional hernia, and one patient was diagnosed with acute intestinal obstruction after clinical and radiological investigations. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of appendicular neoplasms in these eight cases. Meticulous histopathological examination of all appendectomy specimens is important for the proper diagnosis of appendicular neoplasms and to predict their severity. This will help surgeons plan further treatment to increase the patient’s survival rate.

Keywords

Columnar epithelium, Low-grade appendiceal neoplasms, Pseudomyxoma peritonei

The appendix is a vestigial organ located 2 cm below the ileocecal junction and lies in the right iliac fossa of the abdomen. Inflammation of the appendix results in appendicitis. Neoplasms of the appendix are very rare and seen in less than 2% of all appendectomy specimens [1,2]. Most often, they are found incidentally in cases operated for acute appendicitis. Studies on appendicular neoplasms show an increase in their incidence (1). The current WHO classification of digestive tumours (5th edition) categorises epithelial appendiceal tumours as serrated lesions/polyps, mucinous neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms (3). Among appendicular tumours, neuroendocrine tumours are common, and colorectal type adenocarcinoma is relatively rare. One fascinating entity among appendicular tumours is appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, which encompass a heterogeneous group of lesions and were previously categorised by various classification systems. In this case series, we present eight cases of appendiceal neoplasms reported in our institute. Among these, only four cases were operated on for appendicular pathology. In the other cases, appendicular pathology was identified intraoperatively and confirmed after histopathological examination. These cases presented with complaints of ovarian neoplasms, intestinal obstruction, and incisional hernia. We present this case series for its rarity and different clinical and histomorphological presentations.

Case Report

Case 1

A 60-year-old female presented with complaints of excruciating pain on and off for one month, with increased intensity for one day, in the previous scar site from a hysterectomy. Upon examination, a swelling was noticed in the scar area. A clinical diagnosis of an incisional hernia was made, and surgery was planned. Baseline lab investigations were within normal limits. During the operation, the intestines were reduced, and an appendicectomy was performed as the appendix was found to be inflamed. The length of the appendix was 4 cm, and the appendicular lumen was found to be obliterated. Histopathological examination showed clusters and scattered signet ring cells invading into the subserosal adipose tissue, along with pools of extracellular mucin. The resected margin was free of tumour. A final diagnosis of Mucinous adenocarcinoma-Signet ring cell rich was given, with a TNM stage of T3Nx. The resected margin showed no tumour invasion. The patient underwent a right hemicolectomy and was started on chemotherapy (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2).

Case 2

A 62-year-old male presented with right iliac fossa pain for two days and McBurney’s tenderness on local examination. Baseline lab investigations were within normal limits, except for an increased neutrophil count. Preoperatively, acute appendicitis was diagnosed, and an appendicectomy was performed. Intraoperatively, the tip of the appendix was found to be cystically dilated. We received a specimen of the appendix measuring 7 cm in length. The cut surface showed a dilated appendicular tip filled with mucin and a thinned-out appendicular wall. Histopathological sections from the appendix showed appendicular mucosa lined by tall columnar epithelium with intracytoplasmic mucin and basally located nuclei, with the lumen filled with mucin. Sections from the resected margin showed no tumour invasion. A final diagnosis of LAMN-Tis Nx was given. The patient was followed-up for two years with no recurrence (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 3).

Case 3

A 45-year-old female complains of sharp pain in the periumbilical region for one month, with increased pain intensity for the past three days. An ultrasound of the abdomen revealed features of acute appendicitis. Baseline lab investigations are normal, except for mild neutrophilic leukocytosis. An emergency appendectomy was performed. On gross examination, we received an appendix specimen with a periappendicular pad of fat measuring 6 cm in length. The cut surface of the appendix showed a lumen filled with mucoid material. Histopathological examination of the appendix showed a dilated lumen filled with mucin, lined by columnar epithelium with nuclear stratification. No evidence of desmoplasia or invasion was seen. The final diagnosis was LAMN-Tis Nx (low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, confined to the appendix with no lymph node involvement). The resected margin was free of tumour invasion. The patient was followed-up for 18 months with no recurrence (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 4).

Case 4

An 85-year-old male presented with complaints of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and vomiting for two days. On examination, abdominal distension was observed, and an X-ray of the abdomen revealed dilated bowels with multiple air-fluid levels. The clinical diagnosis was acute intestinal obstruction, and surgery was planned. Intraoperatively, a diverticulum and stricture were identified, along with a hardened postileal appendix. A right hemicolectomy was performed, and the specimen was sent for histopathological examination.

The gross specimen consisted of portion of small intestine, ileocaecal junction with appendix and portion of large intestine. On the external surface, a 2 cm diverticulum was observed 1 cm away from the resected margin of the small intestine, and a stricture was found 8 cm from the ileocecal junction in the small intestine. The external surface of the appendix appeared normal, while the cut surface revealed a firm grey-white mass measuring 1.5×1 cm at the tip. The serosa appeared to be free of tumour, and four lymph nodes were made out in the surrounding fat pad.

Microscopic examination revealed intestinal type malignant glands with desmoplastic stroma infiltrating the subserosal fat pad in sections from the appendix. The sections from the diverticulum and stricture showed mixed inflammatory infiltrate in the wall. One out of the four lymph nodes examined showed metastatic adenocarcinomatous deposits. The resected margins were free of tumour. The final diagnosis was moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the appendix, staged as pT3N1a. The patient was placed under follow-up and started on chemotherapy (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 5).

Case 5

A 62-year-old male presented with complaints of sharp, intermittent abdominal pain in the right iliac fossa for three days. Ultrasonogram revealed a distended appendix. A provisional diagnosis of mucocele was made, and an appendicectomy was performed. Baseline lab investigations were within normal limits. We received a gross specimen of a dilated appendix measuring 8 cm in length. The cut surface showed a luminal diameter of 2 cm filled with mucus material. Sections studied from the appendix showed attenuated mucosa lined by mucin-secreting columnar epithelium with mild nuclear atypia, and the lumen was filled with mucin. A final diagnosis of LAMN with a stage of Tis Nx was given. Resected margins also showed tumour invasion. Revision surgery was performed. The patient was disease-free and followed-up for 12 months (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 6).

Case 6

A 65-year-old male presented with complaints of vomiting and abdominal pain in the right iliac fossa for two days. On examination, there was tenderness in the right iliac fossa. Baseline lab investigations were within normal limits. A laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed, revealing an appendix measuring approximately 6 cm in length. The lumen was found to be dilated, measuring 1.6 cm in diameter, and filled with mucoid material. The section studied from the appendix showed attenuated mucosa lined by mucin-secreting columnar epithelium with focal papillary projections. Extracellular mucin was observed dissecting the muscularis propria. The section studied from the resected margin showed no tumour infiltration. A final diagnosis of LAMN (Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm) was given, with a stage of T3Nx. The patient has been on follow-up for nine months with no recurrence (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 7).

Case 7

A 58-year-old female presented with complaints of vague abdominal pain and abdominal distension for the past six months. On examination, an abdominal mass corresponding to 32 weeks of gestation was observed. MRI revealed bilateral mucinous neoplasms of the ovaries with omental metastasis. Serum markers were evaluated, showing normal levels of CA 125 (27.3 U/mL) and elevated levels of CA 19-9 (50.5 U/mL). The patient underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salphingo-oophrectomy and appendicectomy, with a clinical diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP).

On gross examination, we received bilateral ovaries, one measuring 17×15×8 cm and the other measuring 18×12×6 cm. The capsules were found to be intact. The cut surface revealed multiloculated cysts filled with mucoid material. The cyst wall thickness ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 cm. The specimen of the uterus with cervix measured 10×6×4 cm. The cut surface showed an endometrial thickness of 0.2 cm, and the myometrium showed no remarkable changes.

The specimen of the appendix measured 4 cm in length. The cut surface revealed a gelatinous mass measuring 1.5×1 cm at the tip of the appendix.

Microscopic examination showed a malignant neoplasm composed of cords and poorly formed glands with intracellular mucin invading the subserosa, along with areas of abundant extracellular mucin in the appendix sections. The resected margin was free of tumour invasion.

Sections studied from both ovaries showed features of benign mucinous cystadenoma, with the cyst wall lined by mucin-secreting tall columnar epithelium. Sections studied from the uterus showed features of proliferative endometrium and chronic cervicitis.

Sections from one lymph node also shows metastatic adenocarcinomatous deposits and the omentum revealed lobules of mature adipocytes with large pools of acellular mucin, while the peritoneum showed a mesothelial lining with underlying stroma showing tumour infiltration and surrounding desmoplasia.

A final diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix with PMP-T3 N1a M1b was given. The patient is undergoing chemotherapy and being followed-up (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 8).

Case 8

A 35-year-old female presented with complaints of loss of appetite, weight loss, lower abdominal pain, and two months of amenorrhea. On examination, an abdominal mass corresponding to 32 weeks of gestation was detected, with varying consistency. MRI of the pelvis suggested the possibility of a cystadenomatous ovarian neoplasm. The serum marker CA 125 was evaluated and found to be elevated (52.2 U/mL). Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was planned with a clinical diagnosis of ovarian malignancy with PMP.

We received a single grey-white cystic soft tissue mass measuring 17×15×1 cm, with an attached tube measuring 6 cm in length. The capsule was intact, and the cut surface showed a multiloculated cyst filled with mucoid material. The specimen of the uterus with cervix measured 10×5×3 cm, and the cut surface showed an endometrial thickness of 2 mm. The appendix specimen measured 3 cm in length, with the tip of the appendix appearing normal with a patent lumen.

Microscopic examination revealed that sections from the ovary showed features of a benign mucinous cystadenoma, with the cyst wall lined by tall columnar epithelium, basally located nucleus, intracytoplasmic mucin, and congested vessels in the stroma. Sections studied from the uterus showed features of proliferative endometrium and chronic cervicitis. The bilateral tubes and the other ovary showed normal histology.

Sections studied from the appendix showed mucosa lined by columnar epithelium with nuclear stratification and atypia. Pools of acellular mucin were seen dissecting the serosa. The base of the appendix was free of tumour invasion. Sections studied from the omentum and peritoneum showed pools of acellular mucin. The final report indicated a low-grade appendiceal neoplasm with PMP, with TNM stage T4aNx M1a.

As the capsule of the ovary was intact, mucin was seen over the serosal aspect of the appendix, and MRI of other organs was normal, the appendicular origin of PMP was confirmed. The patient is currently undergoing chemotherapy and is under follow-up (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are present in 0.2% to 0.3% of appendectomy specimens, constituting a wide spectrum of lesions from Low-Grade Mucinous Neoplasms (LAMN) to mucinous adenocarcinomas (4). Previously, various classification systems were suggested by Pai RK et al., Misdraji J et al., and Carl NJ et al., which lacked uniformity and were the subject of debate (5),(6),(7). The older classification systems included mucocele, which is now outdated. In a study by Misdraji J et al., appendiceal tumours were classified into two categories: LAMN and adenocarcinoma (6). According to the recent WHO classification, previously used terms such as Mucinous cystadenoma, borderline tumour of the appendix, and mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential are no longer recommended and have been replaced by the new terminology LAMN (3).

In our case series, we have eight cases of appendicular tumours, including five cases of LAMN and three cases of adenocarcinoma. Based on mucin production, there are seven cases of mucinous neoplasms and one case of non-mucinous colorectal type adenocarcinoma. The affected age group ranges from 35 to 65 years, with a median age of 60 years, which is similar to the results of Gundoger O et al., and, contrary to that, males are more affected by LAMN in our series (8),(9).

LAMN is uncommon and accounts for 0.2% to 2% of all appendectomy specimens (7). LAMN is characterised by several patterns, ranging from the classical filiform/villous form to an attenuated monolayer of mucinous epithelium that may show mild nuclear stratification. The appendicular wall shows varying degrees of fibrosis, hyalinisation, and calcification. Mucin may be seen dissecting the appendicular wall, which may extend to the peritoneal surface. Appendiceal carcinomas are distinguished from LAMN by their infiltrative pattern of invasion rather than broad pushing margins seen in LAMN (3). In our present case series, all five cases of LAMN showed fibrotic submucosa and absent lymphoid tissue. Two cases showed filiform and attenuated mucosa, while one case showed scalloped architecture (Table/Fig 10). LAMN is staged according to the AJCC staging manual, and the prognosis of LAMN is stage-dependent (3),(10). HAMN is rare and shows similar histopathological features as LAMN but with a degree of high-grade nuclear atypia.

Studies by Collin DC reported an incidence of 0.082% of appendicular carcinoma (11). In our series, there are two cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma and one case of non-mucinous colorectal-type adenocarcinoma. Similar to the literature, females are affected by mucinous adenocarcinoma in the age group of 50-70 years, while a single case of non-mucinous colorectal-type adenocarcinoma is seen in a male (3).

According to the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) guidelines, they recommend including tumour markers (CEA, CA 19.9, CA 125) in the preoperative workup (2). In our series, tumour markers were studied in only two cases that presented as ovarian neoplasms. CA 125 (52.2 U/mL) and CA 19.9 (50.5 U/mL) were elevated in each case, respectively, and both were associated with PMP. PMP, also called jelly belly, is characterised by the presence of mucinous ascites. It is a rare condition with an incidence of 1 to 2 per million per year and is more common among females (12). The most common cause of PMP is mucinous neoplasms of the appendix, followed by neoplasms of the ovary, endocervix, alimentary organs, urachus, urinary bladder, lung, mucinous cyst of the spleen, and breast (13). In the case of peritoneal metastasis, the grade of peritoneal tumour predicts the prognosis rather than the appendiceal tumour grade (3).

Conclusion

Appendicular neoplasms are very rare, and the current WHO classification of appendicular tumours is simplified for both surgeons and pathologists. This case series of appendicular neoplasms shows different nonspecific clinical presentations, varied histopathological presentations, and an increased incidence of appendicular neoplasms in society. All appendectomy specimens should undergo careful histopathological examination, especially in older individuals. Additionally, the inclusion of tumour markers in the pre-operative workup should be mandatory in cases of PMP. This will help surgeons with early diagnosis, proper management, and prevention of disease progression.

References

1.
Bahmad HF, Aljamal AA, Alvarez Moreno JC, Salami A, Bao P, Alghamdi S, et al. Rising incidence of appendiceal neoplasms over time: Does pathological handling of appendectomy specimens play a role? Ann Diagn Pathol. 2021;52:151724. Doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151724. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Govaerts K, Lurvink RJ, De Hingh IHJT, Van der Speeten K, Villeneuve L, Kusamura S, et al; PSOGI. Appendiceal tumours and pseudomyxomaperitonei: Literature review with PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(1):11-35. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.012. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Misdraji J, Carr NJ, Pai RK. Tumours of the appendix. In: Who classification of tumours: Digestive system tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: World Health Organization (WHO); 2019. p. 135-52.
4.
Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FA. Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxomaperitonei: A population-based study. Eur J SurgOncol. 2008;34(2):196-201. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.002. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Pai RK, Beck AH, Norton JA, Longacre TA. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: Clinicopathologic study of 116 cases with analysis of factors predicting recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(10):1425-39. Doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181af6067. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Misdraji J, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, Balis UJ, Young RH. Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(8):1089-103. Doi: 10.1097/00000478-200308000-00006. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, González-Moreno S, et al; Peritoneal surface oncology group international. A consensus for classification and pathologic reporting of pseudomyxomaperitonei and associated appendicealneoplasia: The results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) Modified Delphi Process. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(1):14- 26. Doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000535. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Gündog? ar Ö, Kimilog? lu E, Komut N, Cin M, Bektas¸ S, Gönüllü D, et al. Evaluation of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms with a new classification system and literature review. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018;29(5):533-42. Doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17605. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Arnason T, Kamionek M, Yang M, Yantiss RK, Misdraji J. Significance of proximal margin involvement in low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(4):518-21. Doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0246-OA. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, editors. New York: Springer; 2017 Jan.
11.
Collins DC. A study of 50,000 specimens of the human vermiform appendix. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955;101(4):437-45.
12.
Ioannidis O, Cheva A, Paraskevas G, Papadimitriou N, Konstantara A, Chatzopoulos S, et al. Pseudomyxomaretroperitonei: Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Rev EspEnferm Dig. 2012;104(5):268-75. Doi: 10.4321/ s1130-01082012000500009. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Carr NJ, McCarthy WF, Sobin LH. Epithelial noncarcinoidtumors and tumor-like lesions of the appendix. A clinicopathologic study of 184 patients with a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer. 1995;75(3):757-68. Doi: 10.1002/1097- 0142(19950201)75:3<757::aid-cncr2820750303>3.0.co;2-f.3.0.CO;2-F>[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64301.18296

Date of Submission: Mar 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 22, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 07, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 30, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 03, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com